I found this concept to be quite interesting. It's deliberate emphasis and use of the same words that have different meanings and/or usage. Confusing nonetheless, these sentences are constructed properly, and are grammatically correct.

Rose rose to put rose rose on her rows of roses.

James, while John had had 'had', had had 'had had'. 'Had had' had had a better effect on the teacher.

That that is, is. That that is not, is not. Is that it? It is.

For my sign, please put more room between the 'Smith' and 'and,' and 'and' and 'Sons'.

If the police police police police, who polices the police police? Police police police police police police.

It was 'and' I said, not 'are', and 'and' and 'are' are different.

"But and and" and "and and and" and "and and so" are all pairs of conjunctions. <-I like this one!

The grand finale:
Wouldn't the sentence "I want to put a hyphen between the words Fish and And and And and Chips in my Fish-And-Chips sign" have been clearer if quotation marks had been placed before Fish, and between Fish and and, and and and And, and And and and, and and and And, and And and and, and and and Chips, as well as after Chips?

Awesome.

Apparently, these are correct too, but I can't tell. I've only read the English version.... (which isn't the same because it translates differently and loses that trademark same-word use.)
Torrente?

Wenn hinter Fliegen Fliegen fliegen, fliegen Fliegen Fliegen hinterher.

Selten ess' ich Essig. Ess' ich Essig, ess' ich Essig zum Salat.

yeah I've heard of these, our English teacher played a game to see who could be the first to properly punctuate one of those

Sorry, That has nothing to do with the thread. I've just always wondered when exactly you would use something like that. I guess here works just as well.

SSG Jake wrote:

Sorry, That has nothing to do with the thread. I've just always wondered when exactly you would use something like that. I guess here works just as well.

YOU POOPED! ^_^

that's confusing! my broken english is already complicated!




*gets angry and leaves the thread*

Interesting

Quote :

Confusing nonetheless, these sentences are constructed properly, and are grammatically correct.

No, they are not grammatically correct. And it's not interesting, since none of those examples are crafted well. There are examples from some good poets that are interesting.. bit don't see any of those here.

Kamerad Ash wrote:

Quote :

Confusing nonetheless, these sentences are constructed properly, and are grammatically correct.

No, they are not grammatically correct. And it's not interesting, since none of those examples are crafted well. There are examples from some good poets that are interesting.. bit don't see any of those here.

You being the picture of correct grammar and all things interesting, I'm sure you'd know.

You're such a negative nancy today. Don't you have some pills to take?
...or a different picture of yourself playing guitar for your ICP cover band?

mm... pills and cupcakes.. cupcakes and pills.. cupcakes and cupcakes.

Kamerad Ash wrote:

mm... pills and cupcakes.. cupcakes and pills.. cupcakes and cupcakes.

o_o

CCCCCCCCCCCCCUUUUUUUUUUUUUPPPPPPPPP
CCCCCCCCCCAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAKKKKKKKKKKKKKEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSS......

Nom nom nom... hromf mumf nom nom nom....

Hguols wrote:

Kamerad Ash wrote:

Quote :

Confusing nonetheless, these sentences are constructed properly, and are grammatically correct.

No, they are not grammatically correct. And it's not interesting, since none of those examples are crafted well. There are examples from some good poets that are interesting.. bit don't see any of those here.

You being the picture of correct grammar and all things interesting, I'm sure you'd know.

funny you should say.

Kamerad Ash wrote:

No, they are not grammatically correct. And it's not interesting, since none of those examples are crafted well. There are examples from some good poets that are interesting.. bit don't see any of those here.

spelling and grammar are two different subjects.. and yea.. i saw the "bit".. i thought i wodl leave it in there for someone to get excited about.. wodl cause I codl.

but there is nor that good fo a sentence.. I kannst do u besserrr. und Ich darf mit duetsh shreiben auh , momentan....

nei, es ist " lol, Ikh mag Duutsches sprichen ".

- viel besser

Seriously, you and that leather...

das ist vinyl, nicht leather.

ugh, you know what I mean. It's the look that counts.

Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo. Top that.

aber sie sieht so heiss aus!