A tad on the freaky site actually.

Interesting. I wanna know what images are mixed in all this. And also what the audible voice says meanwhile there is the scream. This is probably fake anyways, but walt disney is a company I despise because of various reasons regardless.

Hero wrote:

Interesting. I wanna know what images are mixed in all this. And also what the audible voice says meanwhile there is the scream. This is probably fake anyways, but walt disney is a company I despise because of various reasons.

Haha, you act like it wasn't disturbing in any way, shape, or form!

The audio in this was fracking great.

Hero wrote:

Interesting. I wanna know what images are mixed in all this. And also what the audible voice says meanwhile there is the scream. This is probably fake anyways, but walt disney is a company I despise because of various reasons.

._.

Can't you enjoy this as art without dissecting it and picking apart intention, interpretation and meaning?

Kan-o-sushi wrote:

The audio in this was fracking great.

I agree!

Mortal Wombat wrote:

Hero wrote:

Interesting. I wanna know what images are mixed in all this. And also what the audible voice says meanwhile there is the scream. This is probably fake anyways, but walt disney is a company I despise because of various reasons.

Haha, you act like it wasn't disturbing in any way, shape, or form!

In all honesty, at first I thought it was weird. Disturbing? Not so much. If you care to know, I even went to bed straight after that lol.

Hguols wrote:

Hero wrote:

Interesting. I wanna know what images are mixed in all this. And also what the audible voice says meanwhile there is the scream. This is probably fake anyways, but walt disney is a company I despise because of various reasons.

._.

Can't you enjoy this as art without dissecting it and picking apart intention, interpretation and meaning?

no, why?
I could, if it was valuable art. But this is not.

Hero wrote:

Hguols wrote:

Hero wrote:

Interesting. I wanna know what images are mixed in all this. And also what the audible voice says meanwhile there is the scream. This is probably fake anyways, but walt disney is a company I despise because of various reasons.

._.

Can't you enjoy this as art without dissecting it and picking apart intention, interpretation and meaning?

no, why?
I could, if it was valuable art. But this is not.

One man's trash is another man's treasure?

Maybe its because I'm a former art student that I see an artistic value in quite a few things "normal" people wouldn't.

not really disturbing tbh. Saw it already and was more confused than anything. Interesting art piece though.

No, not really disturbing, but it is a bit freaky. I consider that a good thing.

The "history" on this is interesting.

So do any of you remember those Mickey Mouse cartoons from the 1930s? The ones that were just put out on DVDa few years ago? Well, I hear there is one that was unreleased to even the most avid classic disney fans. According to sources, it's nothing special. It's just a continuous loop (like flinstones) of mickey walking past 6 buildings that goes on for two or three minutes before fading out. Unlike the cutesy tunes put in though, the song on this cartoon was not a song at all, just a constant banging on a piano as if the keys for a minute and a half before going to white noise for the remainder of the film. It wasn't the jolly old Mickey we've come to love either, Mickey wasn't dancing, not even smiling, just kind of walking as if you or I were walking, with a normal facial expression, but for some reason his head tilted side to side as he kept this dismal look. Up until a year or two ago, everyone believed that after it cut to black and that was it. When Leonard Maltin was reviewing the cartoon to be put in the complete series, he decided it was too junk to be on the DVD, but wanted to have a digital copy due to the fact that it was a creation of Walt. When he had a digitized version up on his computer to look at the file, he noticed something.

The cartoon was 9 minutes and 4 seconds long.


"After it cut to black, it stayed like that until the 6th minute, before going back into Mickey walking. The sound was different this time. It was a murmur. It wasn't a language, but more like a gurgled cry. As the noise got more indistinguishable and loud over the next minute, the picture began to get weird. The sidewalk started to go in directions that seemed impossible based on the physics of Mickeys walking. And the dismal face of the mouse was slowly curling into a smirk. On the 7th minute, the murmur turned into a bloodcurdling scream (the kind of scream painful to hear) and the picture was getting more obscure. Colors were happening that shouldn't have been possible at the time. Mickey face began to fall apart. his eyes rolled on the bottom of his chin like two marbles in a fishbowl, and his curled smile was pointing upward on the left side of his face. The buildings became rubble floating in midair and the sidewalk was still impossibly navigating in warped directions, a few seeming inconcievable with what we, as humans, know about direction. Mr. Maltin got disturbed and left the room, sending an employee to finish the video and take notes of everything happening up until the last second, and afterward immediately store the disc of the cartoon into the vault. This distorted screaming lasted until 8 minutes and a few seconds in, and then it abruptly cuts to the mickey mouse face at the credits of the end of every video with what sounded like a broken music box playing in the backround. This happened for about 30 seconds. From a security guard working under me who was making rounds outside of that room, I was told that after the last frame, the employee stumbled out of the room with pale skin saying "Real suffering is not known" 7 times before speedily taking the guards pistol and offing himself on the spot. The thing I could get out of Leonard Maltin was that the last frame was a piece of russian text that roughly said "the sights of hell bring its viewers back in". As far as I know, no one else has seen it, (..untill now).

"suicidemouse.avi"

more annoying than anything else :p

when I saw it the first thing that came to mind was "fake"

That was awesome. I love creepy ****** up **** like this.

LastFirstborn wrote:

That was awesome. I love creepy ****** up **** like this.

I agree! Whether its "fake" or not, doesn't matter to me.
This is a great "piece". ^_^

Not real, it came from 4chan quite a while ago, I posted it on firestream several months ago as "weird video of the day" or something. I really like it, even if the video doesn't quite live up to the description.

oh and i ADORE the music from it. Seriously, I watched that thing like 10 times in a row when i found it the first time just to listen to the audio.

olias wrote:

when I saw it the first thing that came to mind was "fake"

Yeah. I wouldn't understand how anyone could think otherwise.

Hoax.

This was originally posted on a "4.chan" sub-board named "/x/" (a social group for conspiracy theorists and paranormal enthusiasts).

Trippy stuff, nonetheless. Hahaha!

Yeah, I looked it up and I guess morbid hoaxes a.k.a. "Creepypasta" are a big part of /x/'s pseudo-culture. I found two other interesting "lost episodes" too:

http://x.datchan.org/index.php?title=Dead_Bart
http://thecolligere.com/entertainment/television/adventures-of-sonic-the-hedgehog-episode-66

LastFirstborn wrote:

Yeah, I looked it up and I guess morbid hoaxes a.k.a. "Creepypasta" are a big part of /x/'s pseudo-culture. I found two other interesting "lost episodes" too:

http://x.datchan.org/index.php?title=Dead_Bart
http://thecolligere.com/entertainment/television/adventures-of-sonic-the-hedgehog-episode-66

I think whoever made that up about Sonic Episode 66 should have researched it a little better.



Dead bart didn't show anything convincing at all.

I found suicide mouse much more intriguing and a better quality presentation. Fake? Who cares. It was cool.