http://www.catholic.com/appeals/new_atheism_appeal.asp

i might not agree with the catholics but i think disrespecting anyones beliefs is a crappy thing to do and this guy is a moron, i bet he wouldnt like it if we stuck a nail through his copy of being a complete moron for dummies

Quote :

Being a Complete Moron for Dummies

Wow, that's really disrespectful.

that's heart breaking. what an idiot.

That's very anti-Christ Black Metal of him. He should have worn corpse paint; would have given him more cred among the masses. It is very disrepectful, but I'm not all surprised.

NapalmDave wrote:

i might not agree with the catholics but i think disrespecting anyones beliefs is a crappy thing to do and this guy is a moron, i bet he wouldnt like it if we stuck a nail through his copy of being a complete moron for dummies

hold on......so you don't believe in the sanctity of the holy communion? a clearly outlined sacrament throughout ALL forms of christianity?

Mikey Erasmus wrote:

NapalmDave wrote:

i might not agree with the catholics but i think disrespecting anyones beliefs is a crappy thing to do and this guy is a moron, i bet he wouldnt like it if we stuck a nail through his copy of being a complete moron for dummies

hold on......so you don't believe in the sanctity of the holy communion? a clearly outlined sacrament throughout ALL forms of christianity?

I am not going to pretend that I have a strong working knowledge of holy communion, and I am not going to speak for NapalmDave, but one can have a differing view/interpretation of the Lord's Supper other than a Roman Catholic one. Yes, it is a sacrament throughout all forms of christianity, but not all expressions of the faith hold to the same practice and view of it. A great book to check out is "The Lord's Supper: Five Views" edited by Gordon T. Smith and brought out by IVP.

I dont think he may have been referring to communion. I think he was meaning "in general" that he doesnt agree with everything. Just like I dont agree with transubstantiation.

whats a Host? (sorry if i sound ignorant)

Kräg wrote:

whats a Host? (sorry if i sound ignorant)

Its just like in Stargate SG-1. Those little snakes that go inside ur head and possess u. I like how the y used the word charlatan lol. And this dude who did this is retarded anyway. Neo-Atheists are stupid. I remember reading about old school atheism like from the 1800's and how they didn't attack people for what they believe. They just said hey thats not for me. But now u got these idiots with their evolution and big bang theories trying to shove Atheism down our throats. I mean their Logic is unfounded they have no evidence for what they say. I mean even Richard Dawkins, the man who just got on the bestseller list for his bok "The God Delusion", when questioned about his Atheism and his faith in evolution almost cried because he couldn't prove anything. Go to the library or whateverand rent the movie "Expelled" by Ben Stein. It reveals some pretty disturbing stuff..

I find it funny how atheists/evolutionists will blast us saying "Well you can't prove none of what you believe!", when they can't either.

Kräg wrote:

whats a Host? (sorry if i sound ignorant)

The Eucharist.

Mark wrote:

Kräg wrote:

whats a Host? (sorry if i sound ignorant)

The Eucharist.

oh yhear, i know it better as the "Body of Christ"

this is a terrible attitude for a "professor." What in the world was he trying to accomplish?

Showing his utter hate for God and Christianity, especially Catholicism. It's more than just a "terrible attitude", it's violence against the Body of Christ itself.

eternalmystery wrote:

I find it funny how atheists/evolutionists will blast us saying "Well you can't prove none of what you believe!", when they can't either.

quoted for truth.

eternalmystery wrote:

I find it funny how atheists/evolutionists will blast us saying "Well you can't prove none of what you believe!", when they can't either.

yea, there is totally no proof for evolution

Metal Blessing wrote:

I dont think he may have been referring to communion. I think he was meaning "in general" that he doesnt agree with everything. Just like I dont agree with transubstantiation.

This might be worth discussing sometime--studying this belief was one of the things that got me seriously exploring Catholicism and Orthodoxy a few years back. It was pretty interesting to find the strong allusions to this teaching in Scripture, and very interesting to see just how prevalent the "real body" view was in the first generations of Christianity. But to be honest, I didn't really start loking into these thigns until I was about 30.

Peace, graybeardheadbanger

mystery wrote:

eternalmystery wrote:

I find it funny how atheists/evolutionists will blast us saying "Well you can't prove none of what you believe!", when they can't either.

yea, there is totally no proof for evolution

Since none exists on the scale evolutionists claim it does [which is why it's called a theory and not a fact].....no. There is no proof. but I can tell you the story of the "made up dinosaur" at the museum in saint paul minnesota that contains ZERO dinosaur bones....and how the museum won't let ANYONE mention the word God or Jesus in the building...now, riddle me this...why isn't the religion of evolution recognized as a religion when it clearly is taken on faith and not facts?

NorthernAsh wrote:

mystery wrote:

eternalmystery wrote:

I find it funny how atheists/evolutionists will blast us saying "Well you can't prove none of what you believe!", when they can't either.

yea, there is totally no proof for evolution

Since none exists on the scale evolutionists claim it does [which is why it's called a theory and not a fact].....

evolution is both a fact and theory.

read up on what a theory is, sir. it has NOTHING to do with if it is proven.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory

theory =/= fact

fact = legitimately demonstrated/ proven.

A theory is a more comprehensive and inclusive form of a hypothesis. A theory still has underlying assumptions that may not have a solid factual base or validity.

"A scientific theory can be considered a deductive theory, in that its content could be expressed in some formal system of logic in which its elementary rules are taken as axioms. In a deductive theory, any sentence which is a logical consequence of one or more of the axioms is also a sentence of that theory." - Wikipedia

Human evolution is a deductive theory. It's propositions and claims to "scientific validity" rest on a system of logic which is based on faulty assumptions and irresponsible use of raw data.

Anyway, back on topic. This article is sadly a representation of the dark times we now live in.

haha sure. lets go with that.